Canadian American Strategic Review

CASR
Home

Background
FLCS

Background
CCV Project

Background
Vehicles

Background
Projects

 Index for
Leopard

Background – Future Combat Systems: Heavy Infantry Assault Vehicle

  Also see: Modest Proposal  A Way to Get to Heavy Infantry Assault Vehicles?  Surplus PzH 2000 SP Gun hulls as a basis for CF HIAV?

 In the recent flurry of  new  CF armoured vehicle announcements,  one type was
 conspicuous by its absense   –  the  Heavy Infantry Assault Vehicle. In August
 2008, the Chief of Land Staff, LGen Andrew Leslie, said  that  he required a small
 number of these specialized,  extremely well-protected assault vehicles.  So what
 happened to the HIAV? The Israelis coined the term HIAV
 to describe heavy armoured personnel vehicles converted
 from tanks. But it could be argued that this HAPC concept
 originated with the 'Kangaroos', WWII carriers created by
 pulling turrets from surplus Canadian-built Ram tanks. So,
 did  LGen Leslie imagine turretless Leopard 2s as HIAVs ?

When the Israelis devised their modern HIAV, they converted captured T-55 tanks. This was no small undertaking, the engine compartment was entirely revised to provide rear egress for dismounts. Israel's next-generation HIAV, the Namer, is a simpler proposition, based as it is on a front-engined Merkava tank chassis. But Canada has no such option. Just the Leopard.

Straightforward Adaptations for Heavy APC Roles?
A simpler international HAPC pattern has emerged – a return to that original  'Kangaroo' concept. Troops sit in the former turret basket area and dismount from the top. Mechanically, such conversions couldn't be simpler but there's also a big downside. Dismounting through the top leaves troops exposed to hostile fire 2m above the ground. Hardly likely to be acceptable.

Straightforward modern Canadian tank conversions have come up before. In 2005-2006, the idea of  turretless Leopard C2s for engineering work was floated. At the time, the old Leopards were to be retired without replacements. Surplus hulls fitted with the usual ploughing and mineclearing implements would suit  the Combat  Engineers, it was thought. The plan:  each CER Field Engineer Squadron would have 4 permanent plough tanks (along with their 2-each Badger AEV and Beaver AVLB bridgelayers ). That concept failed despite its simplicity. Perhaps DND should revive and update the plough tank or simplify  HIAV.